January 14, 2005

Meeting with Community on Frieze/North Quad

Hi!

Yesterday Pam Baker from PIRGIM and I attended a meeting that the University held at the Alumni Center to address concerns with the proposed North Quad plans and demolition of the Frieze Building. You can read the Daily's article on the meeting here: <http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/01/14/41e7ab8b8e728>.

Overall, I think the meeting went very well. The University was very upfront in letting those in attendance know that they planned to move ahead with the construction. Citizens accepted this but hoped that the University would conserve the Carnegie Library and the facade of the building. Business owners from the State Street district supported the new construction, as did many local churches. Pam and I were particularly frustrated with the Old Fourth Ward Association Chairperson, Christine Crockett. She had greeted us at the door quite pleasantly when she thought we were students of a professor in historic preservation, but when she spoke at the meeting she said that students were causing "erosion" in Ann Arbor neighborhoods. She told the State Street businesses that they should be weary of the development because it might become a "clone" of South University: once a "charming" district of town, but with the influence of students had become "tawdry." She was very disrespectful to students, but she did acknowledge that any parking problems in her neighborhoods were due to professors and staff, not students.

I personally feel that these community requests to conserve the facade and library could be honored if they would not cost the already financially-strapped University (except in terms of administrative salaries, apparently ... <http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/01/14/41e7aea45953b>) too much money and as long as North Quad would still house a considerable amount of students. If conserving the facade would only cost 20 beds or so, it might be appropriate to honor the community's wishes, but any substantial loss in housing capacity should not be suffered in order to conserve the front of the historic but neglected building. With the State of Michigan's budget crisis and cuts to higher ed funding and financial aid, students are dedicating more and more time to jobs in order to pay for their education and have less time to deal with landlords. Student Legal Services (SLS) is far too understaffed to meet student tenant needs, as without advertising SLS average 80 cases per lawyer. Further, students no longer have the Ann Arbor Tenants Union (AATU) or similar organization to meet their needs. We must bring more students back on campus so that they can focus on their education instead of getting their deposits back from crooked landlords or worrying about how to pay for broken legs called by faulty porches when landlords refuse to take responsibility <http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/01/22/3e2e4427a24a7?in_archive=1>.

I can't update on the ERC meeting last night, as I was at the North Quad meeting, but I will as soon as I get in contact with McFo.

Have a great weekend!

Rese
Posted by britfox at 22:31:04 | Permanent Link | Comments (2) |
Comments
1 - Christine Crockett is absolutely correct. Students like those that *ahem* tend to reside in the neighborhoods around South University are a corrosive force in Ann Arbor. Both the University and the city would be better off if UTowers, Good Time Charleys, The Brown Jug, Jimmy John‘s, Middle Earth, Pin Ball Pete‘s, Starbucks, and even our dear Rendezvous simply didn‘t exist. It should also be pointed out that districts like South U. exist as products of globalized marketing strategies, even to the extent where local businesses like Good Time Charleys operate to match these trends, and places like Rendezvous flourish on the assertion that they operate in defiance to them. (Comment this)

Written by: Patrick at 2005/01/23 - 02:56:39
2 - I am going to have to defer to the discussion on Ann Arbor is Overrated and agree with them that students have been in Ann Arbor for too long to be a corrosive force on South University, http://www.annarborisoverrated.com/scgi-bin/mt-somethingelse.cgi?entry_id=553. I‘m a bit confused on your last comment; are you saying it‘s also hard to place all of the blame on students because corporations have control over South U? I think you‘re right in that there is a balance between what is available to students and what is demanded by them. However, I would not generalize all of South U to be tawdry. South U has a lot of unique stores that look nice to me. (Comment this)

Written by: Rese at 2005/01/24 - 06:00:01
Write a comment